Demand
Electricity demand is a vital component in the planning, operation, and resilience of power systems. Climate change is expected to alter electricity demand patterns by affecting not only temperature characteristics, such as mean temperature, frequency of temperature extremes, and seasonal variability, but also consumption behaviours across different sectors. Numerous studies project increased cooling demand during hotter summers and reduced heating demand during milder winters as this pattern has been consistently observed across multiple global regions (1,2,3,4,5).
The magnitude and direction of these changes are strongly dependent on region and latitude. For example, countries in warmer climates are expected to experience higher overall demand growth due to increased cooling loads (6,7,8). Climate change also influences electricity consumption by sector and alters temporal demand profiles, including daily and seasonal variations. The residential, commercial, and industrial sectors respond differently to climate drivers (9,10,11). Furthermore, the timing of electricity demand is shifting, with studies projecting changes in peak load hours and seasonal peaks due to rising temperatures and more frequent extreme heat events (1,12,13).
To assess the impacts of climate change on electricity demand, various approaches have been employed. These include the use of climate projections from General Circulation Models (or Global Climate Models, GCMs) and Regional Climate Models (RCMs), often combined with downscaling techniques to capture local climatic variability (14,2,12,15,4). Empirical models, such as regression-based analyses, have also been used to estimate historical relationships between temperature and electricity use (6,7,3). Additionally, simulation tools and integrated energy-climate models are applied to explore future scenarios under varying socio-economic and climatic conditions (9,15,11).
Climate change drivers and affected electricity demand parameters
Demand parameters
Electricity demand is governed by a set of interconnected parameters that respond to both climatic and non-climatic factors. Under climate change, demand parameters, such as annual electricity consumption, peak demand magnitude and its timing, and daily load profiles, are increasingly influenced by variations in temperature, precipitation, and extreme weather.5 identified key demand parameters affected by climate change as (1) total annual demand, influencing long-term generation capacity, (2) size and timing of peak demand, driving reserve margin and infrastructure sizing, (3) spatial distribution, affecting transmission and distribution network planning, and (4) sectoral response capacity, determining how quickly end-users can adapt to changing thermal comfort needs.
Among all climatic variables, air temperature exerts the strongest impacts on electricity demand. The non-linear V-shaped (or U-shaped) relationship, where demand rises both at high and low temperatures due to cooling and heating needs, respectively, is well presented by using Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and Heating Degree Days (HDD) (16,12,17,18,19,2,3). The CDD quantifies the accumulated temperature above a comfort threshold (commmonly 18degC or 65degF), which are mainly correlated with air conditioning demand. The HDD reflects the accumulated temperature below the comfort threshold to estimate electric heating requirements. For instance,1 found that climate change has affected most of the contiguous US after identifying that annual mean CDDs are increasing, leading to significant growth in both average and peak cooling demand, while HDDs are declining, resulting in reduced heating demand. Similarly,11 used national-scale adjustments to CDD and HDD to determine how climate-induced changes in the degree days would shift electricity consumption and peak capacity needs in Macedonia. In Canada,20 applied CDD and HDD projections from multiple downscaled climate models to estimate future changes in space heating and cooling loads across Ontario’s climate zones. Their results showed a consistent increase in CDD and decline in HDD, with implications for building retrofits and peak load planning.
Climate change not only affects total energy use but also reshapes daily and seasonal demand profiles.12 demonstrated that summer peak hours are becoming longer, with higher temperatures intensifying late afternoon summer peaks in a case study of the Tennessee Valley Authority region.13 also confirmed that peak hours are increasing as a result of climate change in North American cities. Shifting seasonal demand to warmer summer, and the demand being more sensitive to climatic conditions in summer are the most commonly observed patterns across studies and across the world (19,21,7,22,18,23,24,25).
Socioeconomic drivers, such as population growth, urbanization, income levels, policy, and technological adoption (e.g., air conditioners, heat pumps, and thermal insulation), influence the response of electricity demand to temperature.2 demonstrated that population growth had a stronger effect on projected residential electricity demand with consumption potentially increasing nearly fivefold by the end of the century in California under high-growth scenarios. Using a stochastic modelling framework,4 found that population growth along with economic growth were the most influential factors affecting electricity demand in Brazil.26 and27 similarly analyzed that population growth due to urbanization or migration can reshape electricity demand patterns and stress local infrastructure, especially when combined with rising temperatures.28 analyzed income level as a demand parameter and found significant increases in total energy consumption in most developing countries.10 found that climate change increases the elasticity of demand to both price and weather variables, particularly in the residential and commercial sectors.11 further emphasized the role of adaptive capacity and policy. Adaptation measures, such as investment in more efficient cooling technologies or demand side management, can mitigate the projected demand increases.
Seasonal variations
Rising temperatures due to climate change have led to a significant shift in seasonal electricity demand, particularly by increasing cooling demand during summer and reducing heating needs during winter. This shifting trend has been widely documented across regional and global studies. For example,14 showed that electricity demand in the United States exhibits a strong nonlinear response to high temperatures, especially above 25-30 degC, driven mainly by demand for air conditioning. Similarly,28 also confirmed this global trend that there are steep increases in demand where air conditioning adoption is rising due to climate change. Regional case studies, such as18 and6, have demonstrated that peak demand coincides more frequently with extreme heat days, stressing both power generation and distribution infrastructure. The anticipated rise in the frequency, intensity, and duration of heatwaves further amplifies these concerns, requiring investments in peak capacity, demand-side management, and adaptation strategies.11 projected increased summer cooling demand across European regions due to higher temperatures, while8 confirmed a similar rise in cooling demand in Cyprus.9 also found that seasonal peaks are shifting in the United States, with summer peaks becoming more dominant due to climate-induced changes in building energy use.
However, while winters are projected to be warmer, the demand responses are more variable.13 introduced a classification of demand response profiles: a “V”-shaped response which is common in mid-latitude temperate cities such as those in North America and Europe, where demand increases at both high and low temperatures; an increasing response, where demand rises steadily with temperature, which can be typically shown in tropical cities; and an unresponsive profile, where minimal or no correlation exists between temperature and electricity demand.3 used multivariate regression in Europe to estimate electricity consumption changes and found that Northern and Central Europe will experience reduced heating demand in winter, while Southern Europe will face increased cooling demand and higher costs in summer. This results in increased annual electricity demand in Spain, while it will decrease in Finland, Germany, and France.5 analyzed how climate change could flatten winter peaks while enhancing summer peaks in the United Kingdom, suggesting that infrastructure planning should shift from winter-dominant to summer-dominant strategies.
Regional variations
The impacts of climate change on electricity demand show considerable regional heterogeneity, influenced by geographic location, climatic baseline, economic development, and infrastructure characteristics. A clear latitudinal pattern exists: countries at lower latitudes are projected to have higher increases in electricity demand for cooling, while higher latitude regions may observe mixed outcomes due to the opposing effects of warmer winters and hotter summers. Similar to the13’s classification,16 analyzed Temperature Response Functions (TRFs) across Europe by fitting the relationship between electricity demand and temperature to three types of curves: a linear decreasing curve for Northern European countries, a linear curve with a horizontal segment for cold and intermediate climate countries, and a V-shaped curve with a comfort zone for intermediate or warm countries, where both heating and cooling demands are affected.
Regional variations in electricity demand due to climate change across Japan show a clear dependency on latitude (19) Northern regions, such as Hokkaido and Tohoku, will experience decreased annual electricity demand owing to reduced heating needs, whereas southern regions from Tokyo to Okinawa will see increased consumption due to extended cooling requirements. Transition zones near the boundary of the northern and southern regions present a balance between reduced heading and increased cooling demands, while these transition zones are shifting northward as climate warming continues.29 also confirmed a decrease in HDD in the northern US, while the increase of CDD is significant in the southern US.
In tropical regions, where average temperatures are already high, even modest increases in temperature can trigger substantial rises in electricity use.6 found that rising temperatures will affect electricity demand across all warming levels due to increasing air conditioning needs, with low adaptive capacity exacerbating system stress in Niger.28 projected larger increases in energy consumption, primarily driven by higher frequency of extreme temperatures and the resulting increased cooling demand. However, in temperate regions, impacts on demand are mixed, varying based on local climate and socioeconomic conditions, as demand can either increase or decrease depending on local climate and geographic incidence of climate change (28).
Sectoral variations
Climate change impacts electricity demand across sectors in different ways due to sector-specific end-use patterns, varying weather sensitivities, and adaptive capacities. Therefore, understanding differences in electricity demand patterns across sectors is essential for ensuring grid resilience under changing climate conditions.
In the residential sector, electricity demand is particularly sensitive to temperature fluctuations, primarily due to the use of heating and cooling appliances to meet residents’ comfort expectations, which increase faster than the climate is changing (5).28 found that temperate regions, warming reduces heating needs, resulting in lower electricity consumption, especially in households using electricity-based heating systems, such as heat pumps. However, in tropical and warmer temperate zones, the demand for space cooling increases substantially with rising temperatures and humidity levels, leading to a net increase in electricity use in residential buildings.30 emphasized that while heating energy use intensity may decline by 18-33%, cooling energy user intensity could rise by as much as 126% by 2070 in Canadian buildings.
The commercial sector is also highly climate-sensitive, primarily due to its dependence on heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.11 projected that under a warmer climate scenario, commercial electricity demand for cooling would increase, especially during peak summer periods, while the reduction in heating demand would be relatively minor.24 showed that commercial electricity demands would increase, driven not only by higher consumption but also by rising electricity prices. This suggests that the commercial sector faces both quantity- and price-based vulnerabilities under climate change.
The industrial sector shows more heterogeneous responses. Its demand is generally less directly related to air temperature, but certain processes, particularly those requireing climate-controlled environments, are affected by heat.10 showed that electricity demand in the industrial sector remains relatively price-inelastic and shows modest temperature sensitivity compared to other sectors. However, long-term changes in the demand may emerge through indirect pathways, such as workforce comfort requirements, advances in technology, or regulatory standards.
In the transportation sector, electricity demand is currently limited as the sector remains largely dependent on petroleum. However, with increasing electrification of transport systems, future electricity demand is expected to rise significantly (28).10 also noted that while the sector’s electricity use is still low, it is highly responsive to economic and price signals, suggesting future variability under combined climate and market pressures.
Methodologies for assessing climate change impacts
Climate data
Climate data is essential for the electricity demand impact assessments under climate change. These data are primarily sourced from Glocal Climate Models (GCMs), which simulate the Earth’s climate system based on physical laws and boundary conditions. GCMs provide long-term projections of atmospheric variables such as temperature and precipitation, which are critical inputs to electricity demand models, especially in studies focusing on temperatrue-sensitive loads like heating and cooling.
Many studies assessing future electricity demand have employed GCM outputs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phases, particularly CMIP5 and CMIP6. For example,12 temperature projections from 20 CMIP5 GCMs to simulate intra-day electricity demand shifts. Similarly,20 relied on GCMs from thh North American CORDEX, which has 23 CMIP6 to assess building heating and cooling demand in Ontario, while16 drew on CMIP5 from the EURO-CORDEX to construct the temperature response function.1 used ERA5 reanalysis data to analyze changes in peak and average thermal demand across the contiguous US. To explore a range of potential future emissions trajectories, studies commonly apply Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). These scenarios (i.e., RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5) represent different greenhouse gas concentration trajectories based on varying degrees of pathway scenarios. The selection of RCPs provides a structured way to assess electricity demand sensitivity under different warming levels. For instance,16 employed three major RCPs (2.6, 4.5, and 8.5) to examine how demand profiles shift across Europe.7 and31 similarly applied four RCPs including RCP6.0 to assess electricity demand responses under climate change, respectively. While4 and14 applied two RCPs (4.5 and 8.5),15 only used the worst pathway, RCP8.5, to investigate climate change impact on energy demand through building-urban-atmosphere simulations. On the other hand,20 evaluated changes of HDDs and CDDs for buildings’ heating and cooling demand under the intermediate scenario, RCP4.5.
Despite the advances in climate data usage, the literature reveals several challenges and limitations. First, the choice of climate models and RCPs is not always clearly justified or consistent across studies, making comparative assessment difficult. Second, biases in raw climate model outputs can distrot demand projections if not corrected or validated using observations. Third, the integration of climate data with energy system models often lacks explicit treatment of uncertainty.12 noted that climate variables alone explain a limited portion of electricity demand variability as socioeconomic, behavioral, and technological factors may play considerable roles. Additionally, while many studies have applied a single or limited number of climate models, ensemble approaches or various combinations of GCMs and RCMs, as used by31,14,15,12,20,32, and6, are therefore essential to improve the robustness of results.
Downscaling methods
Given that GCMs operate at relatively coarse spatial resolutions (typically 100-250 km), their outputs are often inadequate for regional scale modeling. Because electricity planning is typically sensitive to finer-scale temperature variations, it is essential that climate inputs local meteorological conditions with sufficient detail. To address this, two primary categories of downscaling techniques are widely applied in the literature: statistical downscaling and dynamical downscaling.
Statistical downscaling establishes empirical relationships between large-scale GCM variables and local climate observations, using historical data as a training base. These methods are computationally efficient and have been widely used where computational resources or high-resolution models are limited. For example,30 employed CCWorldWeatherGen and WeatherShift™ tools to statistically downscale GCMs and generated site-specific future weather data in Canada. Similarly,12 and14 applied the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) method to statistically downscale CMIP5 GCM projections for United States. The resulting high-resolution weather data were used to simulate changes in electricity demand profiles under a warming climate.4 also used trend-preserving statistical downscaling method to estimate climate-induced changes across Brazil.
In contrast, dynamical downscaling embeds higher-resolution Regional Climate Models (RCMs) within GCMs to explicitly simulate regional climate processes. This approache is particularly beneficial for capturing terrain-driven weather dynamics and localized extremes. Within the North American COPRDEX (NA-CORDEX),20 applied multiple RCMs including CRCM5, RCA4, RegCM4, WRF, CanRCM4, and HIRHAM5 driven by GCMs like HadGEM2-ES, CanESM2, MPI-ESM-LR, MPI-ESM-MR. EC-EARTH, and GFDL-ESM2M, to project changes in building-level heating and cooling demands in Ontario. Similarly,16 used the ERMO2009 RCM under the EURO-CORDEX project to model electricity demand changes across European countries, providing spatially disaggregated insights into future temperature-response dynamics. These dynamical approaches offer more physically consistent outputs than statistical methods while a higher computational cost is required.
Nevertheless, dynamical downscaling is not without limitations. Bias correction is typically necessary because RCM outputs may deviate from observed climatology. Moreover, the selection of GCM-RCM combinations can introduce additional variability into the projections, as a concern emphasized by33. To address this, ensemble approaches using multiple model combinations have become more common to capture the spread of plausible futures and quantify projection uncertainty, although this adds additional computational costs.
Modeling Frameworks
Climate data such as GCMs and RCMs prepared for the appropriate spatial and temporal resolution are integrated into models that simulate or estimate electricity demand responses to climatic variables. The literature broadly categorizes these models into two groups: empirical models ,which are typically data-driven, and simulation-based models, which are process-oriented or scenario-based. These approaches differ in their methodological structure and are selected based on the availability of data, the spatial and temporal scale of analysis, and the objective of the study or project.
Empirical models typically use regression-based methods to quantify the historical relationship between electricity demand and weather variables, mostly temperature.2 used a simple log-linear regression models to estimate residential demand sensitivity and climate change impacts estimation in California.12 developed empirical load models based on hourly utility data and downscaled weather variables to simulate load variability under future climate scenarios.10 extended this approach across multiple sectors and climate variables to evaluate sectoral demand elasticity and response behavior in the United States. While empirical models are statistically robust and adequate for retrospective analysis, they are inherently constrained by the historical range of observed conditions and may not fully capture adaptive or nonlinear responses to future extremes.
Simulation models, on the other hand, allow to explore prospective scenarios by embedding climate variables within energy system or physics models. These include tools like EnergyPlus for building-level simulations (as used by30) and energy system optimization models such as MARKAL (as applied in11). Simulation models offer the advantage of flexibility in exploring technological, behavioral and policy adaptations under different emissions and socioeconomic pathways.15 incorporated building-urban-atmosphere interaction models to simulate energy demand responses under urban heat island effects, demonstrating how climate-urban feedbacks can influence spatial energy use patterns.34 modeled electricity system planning under hydro-climatic uncertainty using robust optimization techniques, highlighting the importance of integrating demand and supply-side climate risks.
Demand forecasting
Electricity demand forecasting plays a pivotal role in the planning of power systems, enabling system operators and utilities to balance supply and demand, ensure reliability, and plan future infrastructure investments. As Canada pursues electrification in response to climate policy and decarbonization goals, understanding the methodologies and assumptions underlying demand forecasting becomes more essential. While the interdependence of provincial grids through initiatives such as Canadian Energy Strategy (35) enables robust electricity systme planning, demand forecasting in Canada is largely decentralized, with each province or territory adopting methodologies tailored to its own regulatory, climatic, and socioeconomic context.
Methodological approaches
In Ontario, the demand forecasting methodology is developed and maintained by the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO,36). The IESO applies a multivariate econometric model that establishes statistical relationships between electricity demand and a set of explanatory variables like weather, economic, and demographic factors. The model is structured to simulate hourly electricity demand at both provincial and zonal levels, reflecting the operational needs of the bulk power system. Specifically, the explanatory variables include weather inputs (e.g., temperature, dew point, cloud cover, and wind speed), calendar effects (e.g., weekends, holidays, and daylight duration), economic and demographic conditions (e.g., population and employment). Forecasts also account for embedded generation, load modifiers, conservation acts, and large step loads. The IESO issues demand forecasts under two main scenarios: firm demand and planned demand. Firm demand, which is used for planning and operating the power system, includes demands committed through the connection assessment process, while planned demand adds potential loads with less certainty to reflect future risk.
In Québec, Hydro-Québec Distribution applies the demand forecasting method as part of its ten-year supply plan (Hydro-QuébecDistribution2020?). The forecast integrates the effects of key developments such as the COVID-19 pandemic, increased efforts on decarbonization, and the results of calls for proposals in emerging markets like blockchain and data centres. The approach is sector-based, with demand forecasted separately for the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors, incorporating elements such as electrification of space and water heating, the rise in electric vehicle (EV) adoption, and the slower growth of solar photovoltaic systems. Climate variability is explicitly embedded in the demand forecast through the use of standard deviations that quantify both forecast uncertainty and climatic uncertainty. Methodological adjustments have been made to improve the treatment of extreme weather conditions in calculating demand risks, although the impact on the overall climate-related uncertainty was found to be limited.
Manitoba Hydro also forecasts electricity demand using a sector-based approach (37). Residential, commercial, and industrial customer classes are forecasted separately based on historical energy use per customer, customer counts, and expected trends. In the recent plan (38), climate change is embedded in demand forecasting primarily through the development of scenarios that reflect varying paces of decarbonization and decentralization. These scenarios are not forecasts, but structured representations of possible energy futures based on different assumptions for key variables such as EV adoption, space heating technologies, economic growth, and customer self-generation. In other words, although climate variables such as temperature changes or extreme weather events are not explicitly accounted for in the demand module, the forecasting model incorporates climate policy and technological adoption as indirect drivers of demand transformation.
BC Hydro’s demand forecasting approach is based on its long-term load forecasting methodology, which projects future electricity demand by incorporating a range of factors including demographic trends, economic activity, energy efficiency and electrification. The forecast includes detailed assessments of expected electricity use by residential, commercial, and industrial customer classes, and integrates anticipated impacts from transportation electrification, building decarbonization, and government climate policies. Climate change is not treated as a separate scenario but is explicitly embedded in the demand forecast through its impact on weather-sensitive electricity demand.
Forecasting drivers
Electricity demand forecasting across Canadian provinces is driven by a set of common factors that are broadly consistent, although the implementation and emphasis of each factor may differ depending on regional contexts. These common drivers include population and economic growth, weather conditions, electrification trends, and the impacts of energy efficiency and demand-side management programs.
Population and economic growth are key determinants of electricity demand across provinces. Manitoba Hydro integrates annual population growth into its residential forecast, alongside real gross domestic product (GDP) and employment projections that feed into residential and industrial demand models (37). In Ontario, the IESO uses demographic projections and economic forecasts, integrating these forecasts into multivariate regression models (36). Weather normalization is applied to account for temperature-sensitive demand, such as heating and cooling. Manitoba Hydro uses a 20-year average to establish baseline weather conditions, with adjustments for heating and cooling degree days reflecting projected changes in climate and electrification of heating (37). The IESO employs multiple weather scenarios (i.e., normal, mild, and extreme) and uses monthly normalization to simulate demand variability in seasonal extremes (36). As weather scenarios are based on historical data rather than forecast, Load Forecast Uncertainty (LFU) is employed to account for the changes in demand due to weather volatility.
Electrification of space heating, transportation, and industrial activity is also identified as a major long-term driver of demand forecasting. The IESO projects that electricity demand will increase by 75% by 2050 due to electrification , particularly in transportation (e.g., EV and rail), space heating, and industrial fuel switching (39). Manitoba Hydro includes heat pumps and EV adoption through end-use profiles and sector-specific forecasts. BC Hydro developed contingency scenarios by considering the accelerated electrification scenario, which assumes full implementation of the electrification plan and provincial greenhouse gas reduction targets, leading to significant demand growth (40). In addition, the inclusion of energy savings from demand-side management (DSM), the influence of customers’ electricity pricing responses, and the consideration of broader provincial energy or climate policies are key components of long-term demand forecasting.
Accounting for climate change in demand forecasting
The IESO (36) explicitly considers both transitional and physical climate uncertainties in its demand forecast. Transitional climate uncertainties refer to the demand-side impact driven by policies, regulations, and societal shifts aimed at mitigating climate change. For example, the 2024 amendment to the Electricity Act empowers the IESO to promote electrification and efficiency measures that reduce overall emissions. However, the pace and extent of electrification , particularly in weather-sensitive technologies like heat pumps, remain uncertain. Physical climate uncertainties arise from the divergence between historical weather patterns and emerging climate conditions, which directly affect temperature-sensitive electricity consumption. As electrification increases, the system becomes more weather-responsive, amplifying the risks associated with climate variability. The IESO distinguishes between acute risks, such as more frequent or intense heatwaves and cold snaps, which mainly affect peak demand, and chronic risks, such as rising average temperatures, which influence total energy use. The IESO acknowledges that relying solely on historical weather data is insufficient under changing climate and has committed to developing climate-informed weather variables and analytical tools for future forecasts. These enhancements aim to better incorporate climate change-induced uncertainties in demand forecasting.
In Manitoba Hydro’s demand forecasting (37), climate considerations are indirectly embedded through weather normalization and scenario-based electrification modelling, but explicit integration of future climate change projections remains limited. It applies a normal weather adjustment, defined as a 20-year historical average, to remove the influence of short-term weather variability from historical load data used in model calibration. This adjusted baseline is used to estimate temperature-sensitive loads such as space heating and cooling. Additionally, forecasts are built using hourly end-use profiles that reflect heating and cooling loads, including the adoption of electrified technologies like heat pumps and EVs. These end-use models incorporate seasonal and diurnal variability, capturing how temperature-related usage patterns will evolve with increased electrification. However, the load forecast does not explicitly incorporate climate change projections, such as those from GCMs, nor does it adjust future HDD and CDD based on projected warming trends. Although electrification scenarios reflect potential policy-driven adoption of heat pumps and air conditioning, these are typically modelled without changing climate conditions. As such, the forecasts do not account for chronic climate shifts (e.g., rising average temperature) or acute events (e.g., heatwaves) that could reshape the seasonal and peak demand profiles over time.
BC Hydro also recognizes the relevance of climate change in electricity demand forecasting, particularly in the context of long-term planning. However, the direct integration of climate data remains minimal (40). The plan indicated that climate change is expected to reduce long-term energy and capacity demand by approximately 2% due to warmer winters and reduced space heating needs, while the decline due to changing climate is less significant compared to other factors. Electrification trends driven by climate policy goals have been more important to demand growth scenarios, such as the Accelerated Electrification Scenario. These scenarios reflect the policy response to climate change, not the physical impacts of the changing climate itself. For example, anticipated demand increases are modelled as part of these potential pathways. This represents an indirect response to climate change through decarbonization strategy, while demand-side impacts of climate change are not directly reflected.
In sum, while the relevance of climate change to electricity demand is well recognized, it is primarily reflected as a policy driver through electrification scenarios rather than as a physical driver of temperature-sensitive electricity use. The continued reliance on historical weather data, coupled with the limited integration of climate-adjusted demand profiles, presents a constraint in accurately modelling future electricity demand under changing climate conditions.
Canadian Applications
The figure below gives two decision-making challenges faced by professionnals in the demand sector of the electricity system in Canada. These challenges were shared during the workshops held in 2025.
